D. Crocker (UCLA-NMC) RFC 657, NIC 31160 (Oct. 25, 1974) Online file: [ISI]<DCROCKER>NAOVTD.TXT
8 bit value Meaning 0 Command sender suggests that he alone will handle vertical tab characters, for the connection. 1 to 250 Command sender suggests that the other party alone should handle tab characters, but suggests that a delay of the indicated value be used. The value is the number of character-times to wait or number of NULs to insert in the data stream before sending the next data character. 251 Command sender suggests that the other party alone handle vertical tabs, but suggests that each occurrence of the character be replaced by carriage-return/linefeed. 252 Command sender suggests that the other party alone handle vertical tabs, but suggests that they be discarded. 253 Command sender suggests that the other party alone should handle tab characters, but suggests that tabbing be simulated. 254 Command sender suggests that the other party alone should handle the output disposition but suggests waiting for a character to be transmitted (on the other simplex connection) before sending more data. Note that, due to the assynchrony of the two simplex connections, phase problems can occur with this option. 255 Command sender suggests that the other party alone should handle the output disposition and suggests nothing about how it should be done.
The guiding rules are that:
The reasoning for the former rule is that if neither want to do it, then
the default in the NAOVTD option dominates. If both want to do it, the
sender, who is presumed to have special knowledge about the data, should
be allowed to do it, taking into account any suggestions the receiver may
make. Simulation is defined as the replacement of the character by
enough line-feeds (only) to advance the paper (or line-pointer) to the
next vertical tab stop.
Note that delays, controlled by the data sender, must consist of NUL
characters, inserted immediately after the line-feed character. This is
necessary due to the assynchrony of network transmissions. As with all
option negotiations, neither party should suggest a state already in
effect except to refuse to negotiate; changes should be acknowledged; and
once refused, an option should not be resuggested until "something
changes" (e.g., another process starts). At any time, either party can
disable further negotiation by giving the appropriate WON'T NAOVTD or
DON'T NAOVTD command.