Request for Comments: 823 Obsoletes IEN-30 and IEN-109
Robert Hinden
Alan Sheltzer
Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
10 Moulton St.
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02238
September 1982
Prepared for
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Information Processing Techniques Office
1400 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, Virginia 22209
RFC 823
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION
2 BACKGROUND
3 FORWARDING INTERNET DATAGRAMS
3.1 Input
3.2 IP Header Checks
3.3 Routing
3.4 Redirects
3.5 Fragmentation
3.6 Header Rebuild
3.7 Output
4 PROTOCOLS SUPPORTED BY THE GATEWAY
4.1 Cross-Net Debugging Protocol
4.2 Host Monitoring Protocol
4.3 ICMP
4.4 Gateway-to-Gateway Protocol
4.4.1 Determining Connectivity to Networks
4.4.2 Determining Connectivity to Neighbors
4.4.3 Exchanging Routing Information
4.4.4 Computing Routes
4.4.5 Non-Routing Gateways
4.4.6 Adding New Neighbors and Networks
4.5 Exterior Gateway Protocol
5 GATEWAY SOFTWARE
5.1 Software Structure
5.1.1 Device Drivers
5.1.2 Network Software
5.1.3 Shared Gateway Software
5.2 Gateway Processes
5.2.1 Network Processes
5.2.2 GGP Process
5.2.3 HMP Process
APPENDIX A. GGP Message Formats
APPENDIX B. Information Maintained by Gateways
APPENDIX C. GGP Events and Responses
REFERENCES
-i-
RFC 823
1 INTRODUCTION
This document explains the design of the Internet gateway
used in the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA)
Internet program. The gateway design was originally documented
in IEN-30, "Gateway Routing: An Implementation Specification"
[2], and was later updated in IEN-109, "How to Build a Gateway"
[3]. This document reflects changes made both in the internet
protocols and in the gateway design since these documents were
released. It supersedes both IEN-30 and IEN-109.
The Internet gateway described in this document is based on
the work of many people; in particular, special credit is given
to V. Strazisar, M. Brescia, E. Rosen, and J. Haverty.
The gateway's primary purpose is to route internet datagrams
to their destination networks. These datagrams are generated and
processed as described in RFC 791, "Internet Protocol - DARPA
Internet Program Protocol Specification" [1]. This document
describes how the gateway forwards datagrams, the routing
algorithm and protocol used to route them, and the software
structure of the current gateway. The current gateway
implementation is written in macro-11 assembly language and runs
in the DEC PDP-11 or LSI-11 16-bit processor.
-1-
RFC 823
2 BACKGROUND
The gateway system has undergone a series of changes since
its inception, and it is continuing to evolve as research
proceeds in the Internet community. This document describes the
implementation as of mid-1982.
Early versions of gateway software were implemented using
the BCPL language and the ELF operating system. This
implementation evolved into one which used the MOS operating
system for increased performance. In late 1981, we began an
effort to produce a totally new gateway implementation. The
primary motivation for this was the need for a system oriented
towards the requirements of an operational communications
facility, rather than the research testbed environment which was
associated with the BCPL implementation. In addition, it was
generally recognized that the complexity and buffering
requirements of future gateway configurations were beyond the
capabilities of the PDP-11/LSI-11 and BCPL architecture. The new
gateway implementation therefore had a second goal of producing a
highly space-efficient implementation in order to provide space
for buffers and for the extra mechanisms, such as monitoring,
which are needed for an operational environment.
-2-
RFC 823
This document describes the implementation of this new
gateway which incorporates several mechanisms for operations
activities, is coded in assembly language for maximum space-
efficiency, but otherwise is fundamentally the same architecture
as the older, research-oriented, implementations.
One of the results of recent research is the thesis that
gateways should be viewed as elements of a gateway system, where
the gateways act as a loosely-coupled packet-switching
communications system. For reasons of maintainability and
operability, it is easiest to build such a system in an
homogeneous fashion where all gateways are under a single
authority and control, as is the practice in other network
implementations.
In order to create a system architecture that permitted
multiple sets of gateways with each set under single control but
acting together to implement a composite single Internet System,
new protocols needed to be developed. These protocols, such as
the "Exterior Gateway Protocol," will be introduced in the later
releases of the gateway implementation.
We also anticipate further changes to the gateway
architecture and implementation to introduce support for new
-3-
RFC 823
capabilities, such as large numbers of networks, access control,
and other requirements which have been proposed by the Internet
research community. This document represents a snapshot of the
current implementation, rather than a specification.
-4-
RFC 823
3 FORWARDING INTERNET DATAGRAMS
This section describes how the gateway forwards datagrams
between networks. A host computer that wants an IP datagram to
reach a host on another network must send the datagram to a
gateway to be forwarded. Before it is sent into the network, the
host attaches to the datagram a local network header containing
the address of the gateway.
When a gateway receives a message, the gateway checks the
message's local network header for possible errors and performs
any actions required by the host-to-network protocol. This
processing involves functions such as verifying the local network
header checksum or generating a local network acknowledgment
message. If the header indicates that the message contains an
Internet datagram, the datagram is passed to the Internet header
check routine. All other messages received that do not pass
these tests are discarded.
-5-
RFC 823
The Internet header check routine performs a number of
validity tests on the IP header. Datagrams that fail these tests
are discarded causing an HMP trap to be sent to the Internet
Network Operations Center (INOC) [7]. The following checks are
currently performed:
After a datagram passes these checks, its Internet destination
address is examined to determine if the datagram is addressed to
the gateway. Each of the gateway's internet addresses (one for
each network interface) is checked against the destination
address in the datagram. If a match is not found, the datagram
is passed to the forwarding routine.
If the datagram is addressed to the gateway itself, the IP
options in the IP header are processed. Currently, the gateway
supports the following IP options:
-6-
RFC 823
The datagram is next processed according to the protocol in the
IP header. If the protocol is not supported by the gateway, it
replies with an ICMP error message and discards the datagram.
The gateway does not support IP reassembly, so fragmented
datagrams which are addressed to the gateway are discarded.
The gateway must make a routing decision for all datagrams
that are to be to forwarded. The routing algorithm provides two
pieces of information for the gateway: 1) the network interface
that should be used to send this datagram and 2) the destination
address that should be put in the local network header of the
datagram.
The gateway maintains a dynamic Routing Table which contains
an entry for each reachable network. The entry consists of a
network number and the address of the neighbor gateway on the
shortest route to the network, or else an indication that the
-7-
RFC 823
gateway is directly connected to the network. A neighbor gateway
is one which shares a common network with this gateway. The
distance metric that is used to determine which neighbor is
closest is defined as the "number of hops," where a gateway is
considered to be zero hops from its directly connected networks,
one hop from a network that is reachable via one other gateway,
etc. The Gateway-to-Gateway Protocol (GGP) is used to update the
Routing Table (see Section 4.4 describing the Gateway-to-Gateway
Protocol).
The gateway tries to match the destination network address
in the IP header of the datagram to be forwarded, with a network
in its Routing Table. If no match is found, the gateway drops
the datagram and sends an ICMP Destination Unreachable message to
the IP source. If the gateway does find an entry for the network
in its table, it will use the network address of the neighbor
gateway entry as the local network destination address of the
datagram. However, if the final destination network is one that
the gateway is directly connected to, the destination address in
the local network header is created from the destination address
in the IP header of the datagram.
-8-
RFC 823
If the routing procedure decides that an IP datagram is to
be sent back out the same network interface that it was read in,
then this gateway is not on the shortest path to the IP final
destination. Nevertheless, the datagram will still be forwarded
to the next address chosen by the routing procedure. If the
datagram is not using the IP Source Route Option, and the IP
source network of the datagram is the same as the network of the
next gateway chosen by the routing procedure, an ICMP Redirect
message will be sent to the IP source host indicating that
another gateway should be used to send traffic to the final IP
destination.
The datagram is passed to the fragmentation routine after
the routing decision has been made. If the next network through
which the datagram must pass has a maximum message size that is
smaller than the size of the datagram, the datagram must be
fragmented. Fragmentation is performed according to the
algorithm described in the Internet Protocol Specification [1].
Certain IP options must be copied into the IP header of all
-9-
RFC 823
fragments, and others appear only in the first fragment according
to the IP specification. If a datagram must be fragmented, but
the Don't fragment bit is set, the datagram is discarded and an
ICMP error message is sent to the IP source of the datagram.
The datagram (or the fragments of the original datagram if
fragmentation was needed) is next passed to a routine that
rebuilds the Internet header. The Time to Live field is
decremented by one and the IP checksum is recomputed.
The local network header is now built. Using the
information obtained from its routing procedure, the gateway
chooses the network interface it considers proper to send the
datagram and to build the destination address in the local
network header.
The datagram is now enqueued on an output queue for delivery
towards its destination. A limit is enforced on the size of the
output queue for each network interface so that a slow network
-10-
RFC 823
does not unfairly use up all of the gateway's buffers. If a
datagram cannot be enqueued due to the limit on the output queue
length, it is dropped and an HMP trap is sent to the INOC. These
traps, and others of a similar nature, are used by operational
personnel to monitor the operations of the gateways.
-11-
RFC 823
4 PROTOCOLS SUPPORTED BY THE GATEWAY
A number of protocols are supported by the gateway to
provide dynamic routing, monitoring, debugging, and error
reporting. These protocols are described below.
The Cross-Net Debugging Protocol (XNET) [8] is used to load
the gateway and to examine and deposit data. The gateway
supports the following XNET op-codes:
The Host Monitoring Protocol (HMP) [6] is used to collect
measurements and status information from the gateways.
Exceptional conditions in the gateways are reported in HMP traps.
The status of a gateway's interfaces, neighbors, and the networks
which it can reach are reported in the HMP status message.
-12-
RFC 823
Two types of gateway statistics, the Host Traffic Matrix and
the gateway throughput, are currently defined by the HMP. The
Host Traffic Matrix records the number of datagrams that pass
through the gateway with a given IP source, destination, and
protocol number. The gateway throughput message collects a
number of important counters that are kept by the gateway. The
current gateway reports the following values:
-13-
RFC 823
The gateway will generate the following ICMP messages under
appropriate circumstances as defined by the ICMP specification
[4]:
The gateway uses the Gateway-to-Gateway Protocol (GGP) to
determine connectivity to networks and neighbor gateways; it is
also used in the implementation of a dynamic, shortest-path
routing algorithm. The current GGP message formats (for release
1003 of the gateway software) are presented in Appendix A.
When a gateway starts running it assumes that all its
neighbor gateways are "down," that it is disconnected from
-14-
RFC 823
networks to which it is attached, and that the distance reported
in routing updates from each neighbor to each network is
"infinity."
The gateway first determines the state of its connectivity
to networks to which it is physically attached. The gateway's
connection to a network is declared up if it can send and receive
internet datagrams on its interface to that network. Note that
the method that the gateway uses to determine its connectivity to
a network is network-dependent. In some networks, the host-to-
network protocol determines whether or not datagrams can be sent
and received on the host interface. In these networks, the
gateway simply checks-status information provided by the protocol
in order to determine if it can communicate with the network. In
other networks, where the host-to-network protocols are less
sophisticated, it may be necessary for the gateway to send
datagrams to itself to determine if it can communicate with the
network. In these networks, the gateways periodically poll the
network using GGP network interface status messages [Appendix A]
to determine if the network interface is operational.
The gateway has two rules relevant to computing distances to
networks: 1) if the gateway can send and receive traffic on its
-15-
RFC 823
network interface, its distance to the network is zero; 2) if it
cannot send and receive traffic on the interface, its distance to
the network is "infinity." Note that if a gateway's network
interface is not working, it may still be able to send traffic to
the network on an alternate route via one of its neighbor
gateways.
The gateway determines connectivity to neighbors using a "K
out of N" algorithm. Every 15 seconds, the gateway sends GGP
Echo messages [Appendix A] to each of its neighbors. The
neighbors respond by sending GGP echo replies. If there is no
reply to K out of N (current values are K=3 and N=4) echo
messages sent to a neighbor, the neighbor is declared down. If a
neighbor is down and J out of M (current values are J=2 and M=4)
echo replies are received, the neighbor is declared to be up.
The values of J,K,M,N and the time interval are operational
parameters which can be adjusted as required.
-16-
RFC 823
The gateway sends routing information in GGP Routing Update
messages. The gateway receives and transmits routing information
reliably using sequence-numbered messages and a retransmission
and acknowledgment scheme as explained below. For each neighbor,
the gateway remembers the Receive Sequence Number, R, that it
received in the most recent routing update from that neighbor.
This value is initialized with the sequence number in the first
Routing Update received from a neighbor after that neighbor's
status is set to "up." On receipt of a routing update from a
neighbor, the gateway subtracts the Receive Sequence Number, R,
from the sequence number in the routing update, S. If this value
(S-R) is greater than or equal to zero, then the gateway accepts
the routing update, sends an acknowledgment (see Appendix A) to
the neighbor containing the sequence number S, and replaces the
Receive Sequence Number, R, with S. If this value (S-R) is less
than zero, the gateway rejects the routing update and sends a
negative acknowledgment [Appendix A] to the neighbor with
sequence number R.
The gateway has a Send Sequence Number, N, for sending
routing updates to all of its neighbors. This sequence number
-17-
RFC 823
can be initialized to any value. The Send Sequence Number is
incremented each time a new routing update is created. On
receiving an acknowledgment for a routing update, the gateway
subtracts the sequence number acknowledged, A, from the Send
Sequence Number, N. If the value (N-A) is non-zero, then an old
routing update is being acknowledged. The gateway continues to
retransmit the most recent routing update to the neighbor that
sent the acknowledgment. If (N-A) is zero, the routing update
has been acknowledged. Note that only the most recent routing
update must be acknowledged; if a second routing update is
generated before the first routing update is acknowledged, only
the second routing update must be acknowledged.
If a negative acknowledgment is received, the gateway
subtracts the sequence number negatively acknowledged, A, from
its Send Sequence Number, N. If this value (N-A) is less than
zero, then the gateway replaces its Send Sequence Number, N, with
the sequence number negatively acknowledged plus one, A+1, and
retransmits the routing update to all of its neighbors. If (N-A)
is greater than or equal to zero, then the gateway continues to
retransmit the routing update using sequence number N. In order
to maintain the correct sequence numbers at all gateways, routing
updates must be retransmitted to all neighbors if the Send
-18-
RFC 823
Sequence Number changes, even if the routing information does not
change.
The gateway retransmits routing updates periodically until
they are acknowledged and whenever its Send Sequence Number
changes. The gateway sends routing updates only to neighbors
that are in the "up" state.
A routing update contains a list of networks that are
reachable through this gateway, and the distance in "number of
hops" to each network mentioned. The routing update only
contains information about a network if the gateway believes that
it is as close or closer to that network then the neighbor which
is to receive the routing update. The network address may be an
internet class A, B, or C address.
The information inside a routing update is processed as
follows. The gateway contains an N x K distance matrix, where N
is the number of networks and K is the number of neighbor
gateways. An entry in this matrix, represented as dm(I,J), is
the distance to network I from neighbor J as reported in the most
-19-
RFC 823
recent routing update from neighbor J. The gateway also contains
a vector indicating the connectivity between itself and its
neighbor gateways. The values in this vector are computed as
discussed above (see Section 4.4.2, Determining Connectivity to
Neighbors). The value of the Jth entry of this vector, which is
the connectivity between the gateway and the Jth neighbor, is
represented as d(J).
The gateway copies the routing update received from the Jth
neighbor into the appropriate row of the distance matrix, then
updates its routes as follows. The gateway calculates a minimum
distance vector which contains the minimum distance to each
network from the gateway. The Ith entry of this vector,
represented as MinD(I) is:
MinD(I) = minimum over all neighbors of d(J) + dm(I,J)
where d(J) is the distance between the gateway and the Jth
neighbor, and dm(I,J) is the distance from the Jth neighbor to
the Ith network. If the Ith network is attached to the gateway
and the gateway can send and receive traffic on its network
interface (see Section 4.4.2), then the gateway sets the Ith
entry of the minimum distance vector to zero.
-20-
RFC 823
Using the minimum distance vector, the gateway computes a
list of neighbor gateways through which to send traffic to each
network. The entry for a given network contains one of the
neighbors that is the minimum distance away from that network.
After updating its routes to the networks, the gateway
computes the new routing updates to be sent to its neighbors.
The gateway reports a network to a neighbor only if it is as
close to or closer to that network than its neighbor. For each
network I, the routing update contains the address of the network
and the minimum distance to that network which is MinD(I).
Finally, the gateway must determine whether it should send
routing updates to its neighbors. The gateway sends new updates
to its neighbors if every one of the following three conditions
occurs: 1) one of the gateway's interfaces changes state, 2)
one of the gateway's neighbor gateways changes state, and 3) the
gateway receives a routing update from a neighbor that is
different from the update that it had previously received from
that neighbor. The gateway sends routing updates only to
neighbors that are currently in the "up" state.
The gateway requests a routing update from neighbors that
are in the "up" state, but from which it has yet received a
-21-
RFC 823
routing update. Routing updates are requested by setting the
appropriate bit in the routing update being sent [Appendix A].
Similarly, if a gateway receives from a neighbor a routing update
in which the bit requesting a routing update is set, the gateway
sends the neighbor the most recent routing update.
A Non-routing Gateway is a gateway that forwards internet
traffic, but does not implement the GGP routing algorithm.
Networks that are behind a Non-routing Gateway are known a-priori
to Routing Gateways. There can be one or more of these networks
which are considered to be directly connected to the Non-routing
Gateway. A Routing Gateway will forward a datagram to a Non-
routing Gateway if it is addressed to a network behind the Non-
routing Gateway. Routing Gateways currently do not send
Redirects for Non-routing Gateways. A Routing Gateway will
always use another Routing Gateway as a path instead of a Non-
routing Gateways if both exist and are the same number of hops
away from the destination network. The Non-routing Gateways path
will be used only when the Routing Gateway path is down; when the
Routing Gateway path comes back up, it will be used again.
-22-
RFC 823
Gateways dynamically add routing information about new
neighbors and new networks to their tables. The gateway
maintains a list of neighbor gateway addresses. When a routing
update is received, the gateway searches this list of addresses
for the Internet source address of the routing update message.
If the Internet source address of the routing update is not
contained in the list of neighbor addresses, the gateway adds
this address to the list of neighbor addresses and sets the
neighbor's connectivity status to "down." Routing updates are
not accepted from neighbors until the GGP polling mechanism has
determined that the neighbor is up.
This strategy of adding new neighbors requires that one
gateway in each pair of neighbor gateways must have the
neighbor's address configured in its tables. The newest gateway
can be given a complete list of neighbors, thus avoiding the need
to re-configure older gateways when new gateways are installed.
Gateways obtain routing information about new networks in
several steps. The gateway has a list of all the networks for
which it currently maintains routing information. When a routing
update is received, if the routing update contains information
-23-
RFC 823
about a new network, the gateway adds this network to the list of
networks for which it maintains routing information. Next, the
gateway adds the new network to its distance matrix. The
distance matrix comprises the is the matrix of distances (number
of hops) to networks as reported in routing updates from the
neighbor gateways. The gateway sets the distance to all new
networks to "infinity," and then computes new routes and new
routing updates as outlined above.
The Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) is used to permit other
gateways and gateway systems to pass routing information to the
DARPA Internet gateways. The use of the EGP permits the user to
perceive all of the networks and gateways as part of one total
Internet system, even though the "exterior" gateways are disjoint
and may use a routing algorithm that is different and not
compatible with that used in the "interior" gateways. The
important elements of the EGP are:
The procedure by which a gateway requests that it become a neighbor of another gateway. This is used when a gateway wants to become a neighbor of another in order to pass
-24-
RFC 823
routing information. This includes the capability to accept or refuse the request.
The procedure by which a gateway decides if another gateway is up or down.
The facility used to pass routing and neighbor information between gateways.
The ability of a gateway to inform other gateways that it is going down and no longer has any routes to any other networks. This permits a gateway to go down in an orderly way without disrupting the rest of the Internet system.
A complete description of the EGP can be found in IEN-209, the
"Exterior Gateway Protocol" [10].
-25-
RFC 823
5 GATEWAY SOFTWARE
The DARPA Internet Gateway runs under the MOS operating
system [9] which provides facilities for:
There is a MOS process for each network that the gateway is
directly connected to. A data structure called a NETBLOCK
contains variables of interest for each network and pointers to
local network routines. Network processes run common gateway
code while network-specific functions are dispatched to the
routines pointed to in the NETBLOCK. There are also processes
for gateway functions which require their own timing, such as GGP
and HMP.
The gateway software can be divided conceptually into three
parts: MOS Device Drivers, Network software, and Shared Gateway
software.
-26-
RFC 823
The gateway has a set of routines to handle sending and
receiving data for each type of hardware interface. There are
routines for initialization, initiation, and interruption for
both the transmit and receive sides of a device. The gateway
supports the following types of devices:
a) ACC LSI-11 1822
b) DEC IMP11a 1822
c) ACC LHDH 1822
d) ACC VDH11E
e) ACC VDH11C
f) Proteon Ring Network
g) RSRE HDLC
h) Interlan Ethernet
i) BBN Fibernet
j) ACC XQ/CP X.25 **
k) ACC XQ/CP HDH **
For each connected network, the gateway has a set of eight
routines which handle local network functions. The network
routines and their functions are described briefly below.
_______________
** Planned, not yet supported.
-27-
RFC 823
Up.net Perform local network initialization such as
flapping the 1822 ready line.
Sg.net Handle specific local network timing functions
such as timing out 1822 Destination Deads.
Rc.net A message has been received from the network
interface. Check for any input errors.
Wc.net A message has been transmitted to the network
interface. Check for any output errors.
Rs.net Set up a buffer (or buffers) to receive messages
on the network interface.
Ws.net Transmit a message to the network interface.
Hc.net Check the local network header of the received
message. Perform any local network protocol
tasks.
Hb.net Rebuild the local network header.
There are network routines for the following types of
networks:
Note: The letters in parentheses refer to the device drivers used
_______________
** Planned, not yet supported.
-28-
RFC 823
for each type of network as described in the previous section.
The internet processing of a datagram is performed by a body
of code which is shared by the network processes. This code
includes routines to check the IP header, perform IP
fragmentation, calculate the IP checksum, forward a datagram, and
implement the routing, monitoring, and error reporting protocols.
When the gateway starts up, each network process calls its
local network initialization routine and read start routine. The
read start routine sets up two maximum network size buffers for
receiving datagrams. The network process then waits for an input
complete signal from the network device driver.
When a message has been received, the MOS Operating System
signals the appropriate network process with an input complete
signal. The network process wakes up and executes the net read
-29-
RFC 823
complete routine. After the message has been processed, the
network process waits for more input.
The net read complete routine is the major message
processing loop in the gateway. The following actions are
performed when a message has been received:
The GGP process periodically sends GGP echos to each of the
gateway's neighbors to determine neighbor connectivity, and sends
interface status messages addressed to itself to determine
network connectivity. The GGP process also sends out routing
updates when necessary. The details of the algorithms currently
implemented by the GGP process are given in Section 4.4,
Gateway-to-Gateway Protocol, and in Appendix C.
-30-
RFC 823
The HMP process handles timer-based gateway statistics
collection and the periodic transmission of traps.
-31-
RFC 823
APPENDIX A. GGP Message Formats
Note that the GGP protocol is currently undergoing extensive
changes to introduce the Exterior Gateway Protocol facility; this
is the vehicle needed to permit gateways in other systems to
exchange routing information with the gateways described in this
document.
Each GGP message consists of an Internet header followed by
one of the messages explained below. The values (in decimal) in
the Internet header used in a GGP message are as follows.
Version 4.
IHL Internet header length in 32-bit words.
Type of Service 0.
Total Length Length of Internet header and data in
octets.
ID, Flags,
Fragment Offset 0.
Time to Live Time to live in seconds. This field is
decremented at least once by each
machine that processes the datagram.
Protocol Gateway Protocol = 3.
Header Checksum The 16 bit one's complement of the one's
complement sum of all 16-bit words in
the header. For computing the checksum,
the checksum field should be zero.
-32-
RFC 823
Source Address The address of the gateway's interface
from which the message is sent.
Destination Address The address of the gateway to which the
message is sent.
-33-
RFC 823
ROUTING UPDATE
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
!Gateway Type ! unused (0) ! ; 2 bytes
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
! Sequence Number ! ; 2 bytes
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
! need-update ! n-distances ! ; 2 bytes
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
! distance 1 ! n1-dist ! ; 2 bytes
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
! net11 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; 1, 2 or 3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ; bytes
! net12 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; 1, 2 or 3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ; bytes
.
.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
! net1n1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; n1 nets at
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ; dist 1
. ...
. ; ndist groups
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ; of nets
! distance n ! nn-dist ! ; 2 bytes
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
! netn1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; 1, 2 or 3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ; bytes
! netn2 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; 1, 2 or 3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ; bytes
.
.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
! netnnn !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; nn nets at
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ; dist n
Gateway Type 12 (decimal)
Sequence Number The 16-bit sequence number used to
identify routing updates.
need-update An 8-bit field. This byte is set to 1
-34-
RFC 823
if the source gateway requests a routing update from the destination gateway, and set to 0 if not.
n-distances An 8-bit field. The number of
distance-groups reported in this update.
Each distance-group consists of a
distance value and a number of nets,
followed by the actual net numbers which
are reachable at that distance. Not all
distances need be reported.
distance 1 hop count (or other distance measure)
which applies to this distance-group.
n1-dist number of nets which are reported in
this distance-group.
net11 1, 2, or 3 bytes for the first net at
distance "distance 1".
net12 second net
...
net1n1 etc.
-35-
RFC 823
ACKNOWLEDGMENT or NEGATIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Gateway Type | Unused | Sequence number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Gateway Type Acknowledgments are type 2. Negative
acknowledgments are type 10.
Sequence Number The 16-bit sequence number that the
gateway is acknowledging or negatively
acknowledging.
-36-
RFC 823
GGP ECHO and ECHO REPLY
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Gateway Type | Unused |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Gateway Type 8 for echo message; 0 for echo reply.
Source Address In an echo message, this is the address
of the gateway on the same network as
the neighbor to which it is sending the
echo message. In an echo reply message,
the source and destination addresses are
simply reversed, and the remainder is
returned unchanged.
-37-
RFC 823
NETWORK INTERFACE STATUS
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
! Gateway Type ! unused !
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Gateway Type 9
Source Address
Destination Address The address of the gateway's network
interface. The gateway can send Net
Interface Status messages to itself to
determine if it is able to send and
receive traffic on its network
interface.
-38-
RFC 823
APPENDIX B. Information Maintained by Gateways
In order to implement the shortest-path routing algorithm,
gateways must maintain information about their connectivity to
networks and other gateways. This section explains the
information maintained by each gateway; this information can be
organized into the following tables and variables.
The number of networks for which the gateway maintains routing information and to which it can forward traffic.
The number of neighbor gateways with which the gateway exchanges routing information.
The addresses of the gateway's network interfaces.
The address of each neighbor gateway's network interface that is on the same network as this gateway.
A vector of the connectivity between this gateway and each of its neighbors.
A matrix of the routing updates received from the neighbor gateways.
-39-
RFC 823
A vector containing the minimum distance to each network.
The routing updates that would have been received from each non-routing neighbor gateway which does not participate in this routing strategy.
A table containing, for each network, a list of the neighbor gateways on a minimum-distance route to the network.
The sequence number that will be used to send the next routing update.
The sequence numbers that the gateway received in the last routing update from each of its neighbors.
A vector indicating whether or not each neighbor has acknowledged the sequence number in the most recent routing update sent.
-40-
RFC 823
APPENDIX C. GGP Events and Responses
The following list shows the GGP events that occur at a
gateway and the gateway's responses. The variables and tables
referred to are listed above.
message. If the message is accepted, send an
Acknowledgment message and proceed with the following
steps.
-41-
RFC 823
Compare the sequence number in the message to the Send
Sequence Number. If the Send Sequence Number is
acknowledged, update the entry in the Received
Acknowledgment Vector for the neighbor that sent the
acknowledgment.
Compare the sequence number in the message to the Send Sequence Number. If necessary, replace the Send Sequence Number, and retransmit the routing updates.
-42-
RFC 823
REFERENCES
[1] Postel, J. (ed.), "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification," RFC 791, USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
[2] Strazisar, V., "Gateway Routing: An Implementation
Specification," IEN-30, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., August
1979.
[3] Strazisar, V., "How to Build a Gateway," IEN-109, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., August 1979.
[4] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol - DARPA
Internet Program Protocol Specification," RFC 792,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
[5] Postel, J., "Assigned Numbers," RFC 790, USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
[6] Littauer, B., Huang, A., Hinden, R., "A Host Monitoring Protocol," IEN-197, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., September 1981.
[7] Santos, P., Chalstrom, H., Linn, J., Herman, J.,
"Architecture of a Network Monitoring, Control and
Management System," Proc. of the 5th Int. Conference on
Computer Communication, October 1980.
[8] Haverty, J., "XNET Formats for Internet Protocol Version 4," IEN-158, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., October 1980.
[9] Mathis, J., Klemba, K., Poggio, "TIU Notebook- Volume 2, Software Documentation," SRI, May 1979.
[10] Rosen, E., "Exterior Gateway Protocol," IEN-209, Bolt
Beranek and Newman Inc., August 1982.
-43-