Network Working Group S. Crocker
Request for Comments #73 UCLA
25 Sept. 70
Response to NWM/RFC #67
- Bill's suggestion is a good one; however, my current policy is to
-
- encourage the most rapid implementation of the protocol in document
-
- #1, and his suggested modification should be delayed. It seems to me
-
- most important to gain experience using the network before making
-
- changes to the protocol which are not dictated by necessity. (I
-
- polled several sites regarding Bill's suggestion. Sites with NCP
-
- implementations under way tended to agree with this policy, while
-
- sites further behind tended to desire Bill's suggested change.)
-
- With respect to changes, in general, I believe that changes are
-
- necessary to improve the efficiency, provide greater flexibility, and
-
- guarantee reliability. Many of us can suggest changes now, but I
-
- suspect that clearer ideas will emerge from usage.
-
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Josh Elliott 1/98 ]
[Page 1]
-